Science diagrams: Correlated with citation count

This one was an unexpected and pretty cool result… It turns out that, in scholarly AI publications, including 2-3 diagrams is correlated with higher citation counts after 3 years. The meta- thing here is that it is a bit odd that diagramming practices were found to be at all related to citation count.

There is another big block of work, which is the majority of my PhD thesis, which is about guidelines for NN architecture diagrams. It turns out that there is a correlation between compliance with >10/12 guidelines, and citation count. (This, of course, is only a small part of the evidence supporting the claim that the guidelines are useful – the majority being empirical user studies.)

There is quite a lot of information… I’ve distilled it in the video below, and also made all the code and data publicly available.

Exec summary

Diagrams are measurably important in science, and may capture aspects of good practice.

Comments

One response to “Science diagrams: Correlated with citation count”

  1. Grammar of graphics? – FUZA Avatar

    […] the theme, I’ve another post about diagrams, more qualitative than the pre-Christmas quantitative citation count treat :).For decades, Yuri Engelhardt and Clive Richards have been researching and teaching about […]

    Like

Leave a comment